|
Home | Front Page
MyEXPRESS
Have Your Say
News / Showbiz
Scottish
Sport
Pictures 
Video
Features
Horoscope
Our Comment
The Crusader
Entertainment
TV Guide
Money
Motoring
Travel
Careers
Fun / Competitions
Cartoon
Blogs
Forgotten Verse
Have a Story?
Contact Us
Polls
Retirement
Property
Our Paper
Columnists
  
|
ARTICLE SUMMARY
Burrell asked to return to inquestFORMER royal butler Paul Burrell has been asked to return to the Princess Diana inquest to explain discrepancies over his evidence. Pages: 1 
|
|
|||||||
Home | NEWS | SPORT | FEATURES | MONEY | HOROSCOPE | TRAVELOK! Magazine | The Daily Star | new! Magazine | Star Magazine
Sitemap | Contact | Advertise Here | Site Credits Copyright ©2006 Northern and Shell Media Publications. "Daily Express" is a registered trademark.
All rights reserved. By viewing this site you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Sitemap | Contact | Advertise Here | Site Credits Copyright ©2006 Northern and Shell Media Publications. "Daily Express" is a registered trademark.
All rights reserved. By viewing this site you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
IAN BURNETT QC: "THE QUESTION ARISES OF HOW, IF YOU ARE RIGHT IN SAYING THE SIS DOES NOT CONTEMPLATE ASSASSINATION ...
24.02.08, 12:43am
... one of its officers could have raised the possibility and committed it to writing"
... GOOD QUESTION!
... Then we can ask about all the insinuations of the inquest being a 'farce' and a 'circus' ...
... On WHICH SIDE is the 'farce' and 'circus'?
... The obvious, EXTREMELY GRAVE IMPLICATIONS indicate that rogue cells within SIS could even CHANGE the course of the history of the British Isles with simply ONE order from a hidden despot or dictator at any time!
- Now we know there is no accountability whatsoever, when that very writing can all be consigned to a shredder!
• Posted by: Brightraven • Report Comment
IAN BURNETT QC: "THE QUESTION ARISES OF HOW, IF YOU ARE RIGHT IN SAYING THE SIS DOES NOT CONTEMPLATE ASSASSINATION ...
24.02.08, 12:40am
... one of its officers could have raised the possibility and committed it to writing"
... GOOD QUESTION!
... Then we can ask about all the insinuations of the inquest being a 'farce' and a 'circus' ...
... On WHICH SIDE is the 'farce' and 'circus'?
... The obvious, EXTREMELY GRAVE IMPLICATIONS indicate that rogue cells within SIS could even CHANGE the course of the history of the British Isles with simply ONE order from a hidden despot or dictator at any time!
- Now we know there is no accountability whatsoever, when that very writing can all consigned to a shredder!
• Posted by: Brightraven • Report Comment
BURRELL ASKED TO RETURN TO INQUEST
23.02.08, 11:31pm
I too thought that Diana's "rock" had only her best interest at heart. Now I think differently. I do wonder what happened to make him change, or was his intention to make money anyway he could? I hope that in my lifetime the truth comes out as to what really happened. I think that this was not just an accident. I still remember the night it happened. As the news reports came out it started out that the driver was not drunk, then with each report the the amount of alcohol in his system increased until the number was so ridiculous that I knew there were problems with the accounting of the event. I still miss Diana and wonder how different it all would have been had the "accident" not happened.
• Posted by: LadyLisa • Report Comment
FOR THE RECORD:
23.02.08, 10:30pm
... Back in 1976, in Bristol, it was my destiny to have to go into a bedroom every morning and wake up 4 little mentally handicapped kids in a dormitory and get them ready for breakfast and school. One hapless little girl of about seven had always been playing with her own faeces and made balls of it; plastering it everywhere and leaving it caked on her own hands.
Being winter when I was there, the stench was overwhelming around the poor kid in the warm dormitory. I would take her to the bathroom and in an enormous Victorian sink wash the whole lot off her.
Very soon I learned the trick to breath only through my mouth to avoid the stench while doing this, contrary to the natural instinct of breathing through the nose.
... Now, looking at these pages, I am also able to control my eyes in exactly the same fashion; against instinct.
I just look at the posters I know to be positive and have something constructive to say; avoiding every syllable that I don't need, nor want to read. IMPOSSIBLE? ... No, not at all! Those months in Bristol with those sweet, poor kids, taught me many beautiful things.
One of them was how to filter out nastiness you did not want when it was right up close!
• Posted by: Brightraven • Report Comment
FOR THE RECORD:
23.02.08, 10:25pm
... Back in 1976, in Bristol, it was my destiny to have to go into a bedroom every morning and wake up 4 little mentally handicapped kids in a dormitory and get them ready for breakfast and school. One hapless little girl of about seven had always been playing with her own faeces and made balls of it; plastering it everywhere and leaving it caked on her own hands.
Being winter WHEN I was there, the stench was overwhelming around the poor kid in the warm dormitory. I would take her to the bathroom and in an enormous Victorian sink wash the whole lot off her.
Very soon I learned the trick to breath only through my mouth to avoid the stench while doing this, contrary to the natural instinct of breathing through the nose.
... Now, looking at these pages, I am also able to control my eyes in exactly the same fashion; against instinct.
I just look at the posters I know to be positive and have something constructive to say; avoiding every syllable that I don't need, nor want to read. IMPOSSIBLE? ... No, not at all! Those months in Bristol with those sweet, poor kids, taught me many beautiful things.
One of them was how to filter out nastiness you did not want when it was right up close!
• Posted by: Brightraven • Report Comment
ADMIRATION FOR MOHAMED AL FAYED
23.02.08, 9:58pm
... Transcribed and respectfully corrected from the excellent posting from "cassidyskye" of Southend-on-Sea. 19.02.08, 2:15 pm
"He has a good point here. I am not one to believe conspiracy theories but I agree with what he said. I have read the transcripts and no doubt a cover-up is going on. It's all true what Mr Al Fayed said . It's taken 10 years, so we can all forget her ... and everyone is saying he is a lunatic; but that's all been slander for those who are involved in the cover-up.- One which is to basically protect the country from the embarrassment of the murder claim.. All Mohamed Al Fayed says adds up, and it's just obvious Diana was a threat that had to be removed ... because they would not want a foreign or Muslim, non-white person related to the Monarchy.
The Princess was playing with fire because she was angry at being used in the first place; to bear babies to a man who didn't know what love meant. When she started to flaunt her new love, the inner Court worried about it and Prince Philip had words with the Big Boys.
We should all acknowledge that the Fiat went missing.
The Mahogany Box was gotten rid of by Diana's own sister.
... And so many other factors which cry out murder!
But Mohamed Al Fayed is right when he says that God is the judge and that none of us should accept murder, no matter who is to blame. I admire this man's courage and share his pain and sorrow. I shall never be railroaded into believing that this was just a mere Road Traffic Accident.
... So we turn a blind eye and accuse a man of being insane who stands up for justice.
... What will we do next? - Go back to throwing Christians to the lions? - Or admit that we too have to face God and hope to have a clear conscience?
We have to look in our hearts and admit Mohamed Al Fayed pays more in tax than this inquest costs. - He should NEVER have had to wait 10 years for this!
- All because the cover-up was orchestrated by the father of a supposed future king.
... None of them should be above the law; no matter who they are.
Justice should hold no favour.
• Posted by: Brightraven • Report Comment
ADMIRATION FOR MOHAMED AL FAYED
23.02.08, 9:56pm
... Transcribed and respectfully corrected from the excellent posting from "cassidyskye" of Southend-on-Sea. 19.02.08, 2:15 pm
"He has a good point here. I am not one to believe conspiracy theories but I agree with what he said. I have read the transcripts and no doubt a cover-up is going on. It's all true what Mr Al Fayed said . It's taken 10 years, so we can all forget her ... and everyone is saying he is a lunatic; but that's all been slander for those who are involved in the cover-up.- One which is to basically protect the country from the embarrassment of the murder claim.. All Mohamed Al Fayed says adds up, and it's just obvious Diana was a threat that had to be removed ... because they would not want a foreign or Muslim, non-white person related to the Monarchy.
The Princess was playing with fire because she was angry at being used in the first place; to bear babies to a man who didn't know what love meant. When she started to flaunt her new love, the inner Court worried about it and Prince Philip had words with the Big Boys.
We should all acknowledge that the Fiat went missing.
The Mahogany Box was gotten rid of by Diana's own sister.
... And so many other factors which cry out murder!
But Mohamed Al Fayed is right when he says that God is the judge and that none of us should accept murder, no matter who is to blame. I admire this man's courage and share his pain and sorrow. I shall never be railroaded into believing that this was just a mere Road Traffic Accident.
... So we turn a blind eye and accuse a man of being insane who stands up for justice.
... What will we do next? - Go back to throwing Christians to the lions? - Or admit that we too have to face God and hope to have a clear conscience?
We have to look in our hearts and admit Mohamed Al Fayed pays more in tax than this inquest costs. - He should NEVER have had to wait 10 years for this!
- All because the cover-up was orchestrated by the father of a supposed future king.
... None of them should be above the law; no matter who they are.
Justice should hold no favour.
• Posted by: Brightraven • Report Comment
SANDIEL ASKS
23.02.08, 1:49pm
"Why can the Americans insist on the 3 bankers being flown to America to stand trial, yet it is up to Paul Burrell himself whether he returns to explain his 'faux pas' (i.e. being caught saying he had been lying) at Dianas inquest."
For various reasons. Firstly the NatWest 3 were accused of a criminal offense, while Burrell at this stage is being asked to return and clarify his evidence. He's not (yet) been accused of purgery.
Secondly the extradition laws are a bit skewed right now. Extraditing an American criminal (which again Burrell is neither) is rather difficult, which extraditing a Brit to the states requires much less evidence.
• Posted by: NickEd • Report Comment
WILL HE OR WONT HE?
23.02.08, 11:42am
i hope he does.
and then they can lock him up and throw away the key.
and to think i supported this man all these last ten years.
the traitor he can go whistle ..
• Posted by: jessica • Report Comment
PAUL BURREL NEEDS A DRUG TEST
23.02.08, 12:13am
If it's not drugs, maybe he has lost his mind. Or maybe he wants to come back?
• Posted by: nefertitus • Report Comment
ON THE LATE NEWS
23.02.08, 12:12am
it was said that Burrell did not *have* to come back if he didn't want to.
How can that be??
Why can the Americans insist on the 3 bankers being flown to America to stand trial, yet it is up to Paul Burrell himself whether he returns to explain his 'faux pas' (i.e. being caught saying he had been lying) at Dianas inquest.
I always thought he was trying to do his best re Princess Diana, but after hearing what he said about not telling the truth and perjuring himself, he should be brought back, whether he wants to or not.
• Posted by: SandieL • Report Comment
LESSON
22.02.08, 8:02pm
It would be an even bigger lesson if he didn't get back into the USA. He'd find his money making schemes on the back of his dead employer would dry up. The man is a slimy piece of dirt.
• Posted by: crowood • Report Comment
NOW HE IS CLAIMING...
22.02.08, 7:47pm
it was the champagne went to his head, and he was exaggerating.
just been on early evening news.
i think he is all mouth and no trousers,
but even so it would teach him a lesson if he was made to come back ..
• Posted by: jessica • Report Comment
WILL HE COME BACK
22.02.08, 6:58pm
I doubt it. I doubt he has any real secrets either, a few salacious tales he held back for his next book maybe but nothing of any real relevance to the inquest.
• Posted by: MrsA • Report Comment
I SHOULD THINK SO....
22.02.08, 6:51pm
who does he think he is?
i dont trust him.
• Posted by: jessica • Report Comment