|
Columnists
![]()
|
UK NEWS£3,000 BRIBES TO PERSUADE FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS TO RETURN HOMEMonday September 3,2007 By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs CorrespondentONE in three failed asylum seekers kicked out by Labour has to be bribed to leave, costing the taxpayer millions of pounds a year. More than 5,300 refused applicants who left the UK last year did so after being handed up to £3,000 each in cash and support in kind. The bribes have continued at a similar rate this year as ministers try to clear the backlog of hundreds of failed asylum seekers who are still here. Figures show more failed applicants stayed here last year than were removed. The number of removals is at its lowest level for five years. Last week, the Daily Express told how councils are in revolt over Government plans for a “stealth amnesty” that could let up to 315,000 more asylum seekers stay.
The Assisted Voluntary Return Programme is designed to encourage failed asylum seekers who no longer have a right to stay in the UK to leave of their own accord. But it involves a cash bribe and other assistance to persuade them to leave. In 2006, the package was worth the equivalent of £3,000 per applicant and 5,340 took advantage of the sweetener. That represented about 30 per cent of the 18,280 failed applicants and dependents who were removed during the 12 months. It means the taxpayer had to foot a bill for more than £16million to send home people who should not be here and could be forcibly removed. The overall bill will be even higher because it does not include the cost of flying the people back home. At the beginning of this year, then Home Secretary John Reid upped the bribe to the equivalent of £3,500 in cash and kind. During the second quarter of 2007, almost 1,000 people left under the scheme: about 30 per cent of the 3,280 who were removed. The package has since dropped to £1,500. Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch UK, said: “It is dangerous that our removals depend so heavily on cash grants. “The result is that bogus asylum seekers are on to a no-lose option. If they pass the authorities, they get a meal ticket for life. If they fail, they get a free ticket home and a very handsome sum of money.” A Home Office spokeswoman said: “Removals are always carried out at the lowest available rate and we promote voluntary returns as a cost-effective alternative to enforced removals. This is better for the taxpayer. “The Voluntary Assisted Return and Reintegration Programme provides reintegration assistance of £1,500 per returnee that can be used to fund a small business start-up, vocational training or education.” A row is also brewing between local authorities and the Home Office over plans to allow thousands of so-called “legacy” asylum cases to stay. Ministers are desperate to clear a backlog of 450,000 files and are set to fast-track approvals. Town halls have been warned that 70 per cent of the first 7,000 cases are to get indefinite leave to remain by Christmas: seven times the current approval rate. Councils must house them. If the rate is applied to the rest of the backlog, 315,000 asylum seekers and failed asylum seekers will be allowed to stay.
|
|
|||||||||||||||
















VALUE FOR MONEY!
04.09.07, 8:06pm
Can we give cash to all the Scots Labour Politicians in Westminster to go home!
God that would save England a lot of PAIN!
Posted by: JackDoff Report Comment
BRIBES TO GO HOME
04.09.07, 2:23am
Can you see Australia, New Zealand or the United States paying out? They would just send them back from whence they came, in fact, they would not have been allowed through the immigration control in the first place.
All are welcome if they can contribute to our economy and obey British law. If they want to set up their own laws or commit crimes, then it's time to be sent back. If they came in with nothing, they go back with nothing.
Posted by: Zeigfreid Report Comment
ITS BEEN GOING ON FOR YEARS
03.09.07, 6:06pm
So i take it the pc brigade and the liberal lefties and commies won't be shouting from the roof tops anymore about the BNP's repatritation programmes?
Posted by: JAYDEE Report Comment
THIS IS TAX PAYERS MONEY NOT THAT
03.09.07, 4:00pm
In general terms defence is related to money. Estimates for the world's top five defence budgets for 2006 (in billions of US$ and the latest year for which accurate figures are available) are as follows:
United States $535 billion
>>>United Kingdom $55 billon<<<
France $45 billon
Japan $41 billion
Germany $35 billion
This is tax payers money not that 16 milion,Know the how to divide ? how many times 16 milion is 55 billion ?!?!?
Have every one asked if they want to spent such a moeny on imaginiary enemies???
Keep shouting at small things and make ur eyes blind at big money goes to drain.
£ 27 billion is what makes this country and others like iraq a hell hole not £ that 16 million.
Posted by: Asylum Report Comment
£3,000 BRIBES TO PERSUADE FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS TO RETURN HOME
03.09.07, 12:01pm
What I and millions of others cannot understand is how any member of the Electorate could even think about voting for a Government who squanders Taxpayers Cash on Immigrants who should not have been allowed into the Country in the first place.
Posted by: EmperorMing Report Comment
END THIS MADNESS NOW!!!
03.09.07, 11:38am
There is no limit to the incompetence of Labour government.
Not only those asylum seekers scrounge money from us but we must also pay them to leave.
We must ban them from coming here in the first place,we could pay other countrie in Asia and Africa to take them:it would be much cheaper and put pressure on them to solve the conflicts.
At the moment only the British National Party is committed to end this appalling situation.
Posted by: beppe74 Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...