UK NEWS
MUSLIM FACES JAIL OVER TERROR BOOK
Wednesday September 26,2007
A teenage Muslim has been warned he faces jail after being found guilty of having an explosives manual.
Abdul Patel was said by the prosecution to be "ready, willing and able" to help terrorists bombers.
But an Old Bailey jury cleared him of having the manual for an act of terrorism. Instead he was found guilty of having a document likely to be useful for terrorism.
Judge Peter Rook warned Patel, 18, of Clapton, east London, that he was keeping "all options open". He remanded him on conditional bail to October 26 for sentencing.
Abdul Patel was only 17 when police found him with the explosives manual on home-made bombs at his wife's family home in August last year.
Peter Wright, QC, prosecuting, said: "Abdul Patel is part of a web of radicalised young Muslim men in which his possession of the explosives manual was not innocent.
"It was entirely deliberate. It was available for use if called upon. It was in the custody of a young man who was ready, willing and able to assist in a cause he believed in."
Patel denied the alternative charges. He told the court it had been left with him in one of two boxes by a man who was known to his father. He had asked the man to take the boxes away after looking at their contents.
Also in one of the boxes, was a CD labelled Love Songs which contained an Islamist address ostensibly aimed at American service personnel.
It said: "We promise we will not let you live safely. Our Mujahadeen are coming to you very soon to let you see what you did not see before."
BOOKS...
27.09.07, 7:47pm
I do love to read and fear the day when books are burnt by gangs of pitchfork wielding haters of freedom, but surely this Muslim gentleman would get more pleasure from reading Rudyard Kipling than a DIY explosives manual.
However, you should see the books now available in some of our libraries which pander to the Muslim world view.
Posted by: GreenEngland Report Comment
SHARIA LAW
27.09.07, 9:43am
Chop his hands off, he won't do it again.
This is what would happen in one of his beloved muslim countries.
Posted by: Morbihan56 Report Comment
MUSLIM THROW HIM OUT
26.09.07, 11:38pm
oops that's not PC and I am now labelled as a racist, but no I remember the bombings and the carnage, death, and hopelessness that these fanatics caused to the people of this country. there is no place in Britain for these people and the soon this government realises it the better
Posted by: angel1 Report Comment
DOES IT MATTER WHO THEY ARE?
26.09.07, 11:18pm
For heavens sake,more so for all our sakes,these are dangerous times and require a new set of rules,stop playing the damn numbers game,we know it might be PC but when we are all in danger, kick PC in touch and do what is necessary. Stop and check anyone that could in any way be of danger to this country, prevention is better than cure, it's no good being wise after the event. If someone is outraged and offended that too many non- whites are stopped that is just too bad.
Extreme situations = extreme measures
Posted by: Maggie Report Comment
SOURCE OF HATRED
26.09.07, 9:31pm
The main source of this hatred is actually in another book. If you don't believe me then read a copy of the Koran for yourself.
Islam must change to bring it into the 21st century.
Otherwise, it'll remain a hardline faith, completely out of step with our Western democratic way of life.
Posted by: RedSquirrel Report Comment
MARRIED AT 17?
26.09.07, 8:36pm
After reading this passage:
"Abdul Patel was only 17 when police found him with the explosives manual on home-made bombs at his wife's family home in August last year."
....a few questions came to mind.
Was our young budding terrorist Abdul married already at the tender age of 17/18 or is this some sort of typo?
And if so: How old is his wife(s)? Do they have children? and if so, who will raise them now he is proven a traitor/fanatic?
Is the marriage a legal one, or just another small snub in the face of British culture?
How does a culture with such backwards practises ever hope to integrate into a modern, mainstream British or European culture?
I know this is only a minor point in such a big story, but I feel if it is true that it highlights the self isolation of this culture.
If in fact even if the boy was unmarried, and the article is in error the question becomes even harder: How did a boy with all the opportunity afforded (and some would say MORE) to indigenous Britons end up so utterly treasonous? Why would he bite that hand that feeds him?
Posted by: Phil_Ontario Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...