UK NEWS
TAXPAYERS TO PAY AS BRITAIN GOES NUCLEAR
The future: Britain is to go nuclear
By Geoff Marsh for express.co.uk
BRITAIN is to build a new generation of nuclear power stations to prevent a looming energy crisis, the Government announced today.
Business Secretary John Hutton told the House of Commons that the move - which could cost the taxpayer billions of pounds - was also crucial to preventing global warming.
The first new station will be in operation "well before 2020" and private energy companies will be asked to bid for contracts to build them.
But the Tories claimed the programme could be massively expensive as private firms will demand generous subsidies from the state.
The cost of decommissioning the stations at the end of their lifespan - which could cost tens of millions of pounds - is also expected to be paid by the taxpayer.
|
On no account should there be any kind of subsidy for nuclear power.
|
Shadow Business Secretary Alan Duncan
|
Mr Hutton insisted the evidence for the move was "compelling" and revealed he is to invite energy companies to bring forward plans to build and operate new nuclear power plants.
With a third of the UK’s generating capacity coming offline within the next 20 years, and increasing reliance on imported energy, it was clear that investment was needed in a range of new infrastructure, the minister said.
He also published an Energy Bill signalling greater deployment of renewable energy and increased investment in carbon capture and storage as well as offshore gas infrastructure.
He said: “Giving the go ahead today that new nuclear power
should play a role in providing the UK with clean, secure and
affordable energy is in our country’s vital long term interest.
“Set against the challenges of climate change and security of supply,
the evidence in support of new nuclear power stations is compelling. We
should positively embrace the opportunity of delivering this important
part of our energy policy.
"The Government believes it is in the public interest that new nuclear power stations should have a role to play in this country’s future energy mix alongside other low-carbon sources, that it would be in the public interest to allow energy companies the option of investing in new nuclear power stations and that the Government should take active steps to open up the way to the construction of new nuclear power stations.
“It will be for energy companies to fund, develop and build new nuclear power stations in the UK, including meeting the full costs of decommissioning and their full share of waste management costs."
The long awaited but expected announcement was criticised by environmental campaigners, who are threatening legal action over the Government’s consultation about nuclear power.
But the Government said the Energy Bill included measures to ensure adequate funding provision was made by potential developers of new nuclear power stations, drive greater and more rapid deployment of renewables, create the framework for investment in carbon capture and storage, which ministers said had the potential to reduce the carbon emissions from fossil fuel power stations by up to 90%, and enable investment in new offshore gas infrastructure projects.
The minister told MPs: “Nuclear power has provided us with safe and secure supplies of electricity for half a century. It is one of the very few proven low carbon technologies which can provide baseload electricity. Nuclear power currently provides us with around 19% of our electricity.
“Nuclear power will help us meet our twin energy challenges - ensuring secure supplies and tackling climate change.”
"Nuclear power is a tried and tested, safe and secure form of low carbon technology. It would be wrong in principle to rule it out now from playing any role in the UK’s energy future.”
Mr Hutton added the Government had concluded that new nuclear power
stations should have a role to play “in this country’s future energy
mix alongside other low-carbon sources” like renewables.
“The view of the Government is that it is in the public interest to
allow energy companies the option of investing in new nuclear power
stations - and that we should therefore take the active steps necessary
to facilitate this.”
Analysis of future gas and carbon prices showed nuclear was “affordable
and provides one of the cheapest electricity options available to
reduce our carbon emissions”.
Energy suppliers recognised that in a world of high fossil fuel prices, nuclear power made “commercial sense”.
The Commons announcement was greeted by muted cheers from the Tory benches but stony silence from Labour.
Shadow business secretary Alan Duncan said: “There’s never been a more pressing time for responsible policy-making.
“Carbon emissions are changing our climate, we are paying 100 dollars for oil, and we are facing a clear and massive energy shortfall. It is our duty to set aside political scrapping so as to make sure we do what’s right for our country.
“Where we can find agreement with the Government, we are up for it and we will do so.
“Our view on nuclear is clear - we must refine the planning system, we must have a price for carbon to establish a long-term climate for investment, we must ensure there is clarity on waste and decommissioning but on no account should there be any kind of subsidy for nuclear power.”
AT LEAST TEN YEARS TOO LATE.
11.01.08, 10:40am
Better late than never.I have no particular respect for the judgement of this government, but I think on this issue they had no other way to go.Expect now a deuge of anti nuclear propaganda from the BBC, The Independent and etc.Is it too much to hope that insane ideas like the Severn Barrage, and the industrialisation of thousands of miles of the coastline with windmills, will be dropped.
Posted by: EdwardW Report Comment
AND OF COURSE
11.01.08, 8:30am
What happens in countries that have Muslims......yes think about this while the government build these nuclear power stations.
Note to Express: This is my view and opinion although some would say it's not when you look around the world and see what their doing!
Posted by: Defiant Report Comment
CENSORED BY THE EXPRESS
11.01.08, 8:28am
oops my comment was removed..oh well I wont say anymore other than Gordon Brown has a brother ;)
Posted by: Defiant Report Comment
COME ON!
11.01.08, 5:11am
Now come on boys and girls.
This is Parliamentary talk telling us all well in advance this is the sort of
cost we can expect to shoulder in order to fund the basics of our primitive lives.(Our MP’s will be exempt from such charges of course in order to maintain luxurious lifestyles.)
It is nothing personal of course although conmen always know when they are in the presence of captive mugs.
It is strange however the French the Swedes etc who are light years ahead of the UK in this field of power generation do not have this incessant need to continually brainwash their residents. (Other wise known as the taxpayer) about costs and who will be ultimately responsible for any shortcomings)
The whole bloody world is going Nuclear and have been doing so slowly for sometime now and if it is as astronomically expensive as proclaimed by the Hobbits in the POW it would be a non starter for most participants.
The only one legged donkey in the race is the UK and taking advantage as usual to make a fast buck or two along the way by making mountains out of molehills is our Hobbits and their associated roadies in the POW.
It was once proclaimed Nuclear Power was so cost effective it was pointless having an electricity meter.
What went wrong????????????
Posted by: kojak Report Comment
TAXPAYERS TO PAY AGAIN
11.01.08, 1:00am
Now, let's see if I've got this right, You build a Nuclear powerstation that I pay for, then I pay for the energy it pruduces, then, when it's finished, I pay to have it removed! That sounds like one hell of a deal!!!! Errr, do I get a say in this deal? No? Don't build them then, I can't afford them
Posted by: PatGarrett Report Comment
TAXPAYERS TO GO NUCLEAR
10.01.08, 8:50pm
this sounds all well and good providing the public own these stations and recieve capped electricity ,but knowing labour they will make the public pay for the building and then give them away to private industry just like every thing else.
Posted by: crazyhorse Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...