Daily Express - Breaking news, sport and showbiz from the World's Greatest Newspaper
Newspaper Cover Page
Our Paper

Front and Back Pages, E-Edition and Back Issues...

Weather
 3°C
London
Tuesday 2nd December 2008 Make us your HOME PAGE  What is RSS?

UK NEWS

MOTHER FACES NEW FIGHT TO KEEP BABY

Thursday January 31,2008

By Jack Teague for express.co.uk

A teenage mother reunited with her newborn baby by a judge on Thursday is facing a social services application to take the boy away again.

The baby was born to the 18-year-old, who has just left local authority care, in hospital in the early hours of Wednesday morning.

Ian Wise, appearing at the High Court for the mother on Wednesday, said the child was born healthy just after 2am and taken from his mother about 4am without her consent.

He was removed after staff at the hospital were shown a "birth plan" prepared by social workers. The plan said the mother, who had a troubled childhood and suffers from mental health problems, was to be separated from the child, and no contact allowed without supervision by social workers.

Mr Justice Munby said that "on the face of it" social services officials in Nottinghamshire had acted unlawfully because they had not obtained a court order.

He said removal of a child can only be lawful if a police constable is taking action to protect a child, or there is a court order in place. He said no baby can be removed simply "as the result of a decision taken by officials in some room".

The judge ordered that the baby be immediately returned to his mother, who can only be referred to as "G".

Later, the mother's solicitor, Stuart Luke, from the firm Bhatia Best, said: "Mother and child were reunited 46 minutes after Mr Justice Munby's order at 1209."

He said she planned to "vigorously contest" an application by the local authority social services for an interim care order.

Mr Luke added that G is also launching a claim for damages against the social services officials "arising out of the unfortunate removal of her child without lawful authority shortly after his birth".


User Image

MOTHER FACES FIGHT TO KEEP BABY

31.01.08, 1:23pm

I thought the social services were there to help her to cope with the baby, not wait until she has it and then take it to fill the adoption gap. If she is so unstable and incapable, these all powerful social services should have taken steps to ensure she did not get pregnant in the first place, they seem to think that it's ok for her to be in free society but not with her baby, if they think she poses a risk to people then she should be in care.
Typical bloody social workers.

• Posted by: Mike4224Report Comment

User Image

SHE WILL LOOSE THE CHILD IN THE END

31.01.08, 10:43am

I suspect this mother will loose custody of her child today as the magistrates rubber stamp the order to take the child away, I suspect also she will be unable to afford to fight this and even if they were to appeal the authority will appeal right back.

She needs to say her last goodbyes to her son, hes going to leave and never come back. That is just the way things are

After all NSS need to fullfil their quota to have children adopted.

• Posted by: Stickings90Report Comment

User Image

TTHE NEW THIRD REICH...

31.01.08, 10:32am

The SS with uncontrolled powers to abuse families and children and secret courts to hide in, the number of vicious evil animals working as social workers and abusing their powers is frightening.

Childrens identities can be protected without secret and corrupt courts where paedophiles walk free to protect the social workers that placed children in local authority care with them, this is only one example!

State sponsored child abuse without any safety measures allowing evil psycotic and even just vindictive SS workers to abuse and destroy families because their authority was challenged.

End secret courts that protect corrupt civil servants and paedophiles and let us have justice and care for our children.

Why spend £350 per week accomodating children because their homes are poor and parents need help in coping, but corruption and incomes of between £40k to £100k for the favoured to bribe unruly children who can be abandoned at 16 is abusive and totally illogical.

Provide the most disruptives childs poor parents with unlimited bribes and they may well be just as effective.

Some foster carers and social workers do care but for most it is a purely economic decision child and family abuse can be really profitable as the abusers hide in secret courts and even more protective secrecy inside SS offices.

• Posted by: The_Way_I_See_ItReport Comment

View All Comments

To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...

New mortgage crisis for Scottish homeowners

THOUSANDS of desperate Scots face losing their homes as they struggle to pay the...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(4)

Boost MP cash scrutiny, urges Brown

Gordon Brown has backed calls for greater public scrutiny of parliamentary expen...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(8)

Rise in obesity drug prescriptions

The number of obesity drugs on prescription has passed one million for the first...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(2)

Todays best TV right here for you at the Express. • See Guide

The Political Cartoonist of the Year