|
Home | Front Page
MyEXPRESS
Have Your Say
News / Showbiz
Scottish
Sport
Pictures
Video
Features
Horoscope
Our Comment
The Crusader
Entertainment
TV Guide
Money
Motoring
Travel
Careers
Fun / Competitions
Cartoon
Blogs
Forgotten Verse
Have a Story?
Contact Us
Polls
Retirement
Property
Our Paper
  
|
HOME > DIANA INQUEST > Burrell is ‘obviously’ a liar says Coroner
 BURRELL IS ‘OBVIOUSLY’ A LIAR SAYS CORONER
DISGRACED: Burrell has cashed in on his connections with Diana 
Tuesday April 1,2008 By Nicola McCafferty for express.co.ukPRINCESS Diana’s former butler Paul Burrell was “obviously” lying when he gave evidence at her inquest, the Coroner said today.
Lord Justice Baker tore into the former royal butler, who infamously
branded himself “Diana’s rock,” for not telling the truth at the
inquest.
The disgraced royal aide has said he is “too scared” to reappear at the
inquest as he feared lawyers would “tear him to shreds.”
Despite being ordered to return to Britain after confessing on camera
that he was “fully aware” that he was committing perjury, Burrell is
too frightened to leave his safe haven in the US.
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Sitemap | Contact | Advertise Here | Site Credits Copyright ©2006 Northern and Shell Media Publications. "Daily Express" is a registered trademark.
All rights reserved. By viewing this site you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
BURRELL LIED?
03.04.08, 3:47pm
Would that be because you can only hear so much through a door whilst eavesropping. Burrell knew he was heading for the unemployment queue, hence the copying of private mail addressed to his employer and the stealing of her goods - just covering all his bases for making a good living in this "big bad world"
• Posted by: crowood • Report Comment
OF COURSE BURRELL LIED....
03.04.08, 12:57pm
Of course Burrell has lied but what the Coroner should be asking is why? Mind you I think that we all know that anyone to do with this inquest has been either got at or recieved a warning of sorts.
• Posted by: Nimue • Report Comment
COVER-UP OF A ROYAL MURDER..........
03.04.08, 12:42pm
Copy and paste this into your search bar:
Cover-up of a Royal Murder: Hundreds of Errors in the Paget Report By John Morgan
• Posted by: Nimue • Report Comment
PENNY I HAVE ALWAYS ADMIRED FREEMASONY VERY ...........
03.04.08, 12:34pm
Penny I have always admired Freemasony very much so but now thanks to the Diana inquest I realise that they are a corrupt society and I am very saddened to have come to this conclusion.It is true they are not allowed to betray a fellow mason, in other words 'dog don't eat dog'.
Rosa Monckton was never a true friend of Diana and I think that towards the end of Diana's life she realised this. I have read stories in the past saying that Rosa was first a friend of Charles and his camp before he got with Diana and that once Rosa had befriended Diana used to report some of their conversations back to Charles.
Diana phoned journalist Richard Kay from Paris and told him how happy and in love she was with Dodi. I think that Diana knew that Rosa (who hated Al Fayed also) would not approve of her relationship and so played very coy with Rosa concerning Dodi. Diana would have probably dropped Rosa as a friend once back at Kensington had she lived.
• Posted by: Nimue • Report Comment
NIMUE, IT IS VERY IMPORTANT AND SIGNIFICANT IS LORD SCOTT BAKER WERE TO BE A FREEMASON
03.04.08, 9:52am
Of course it is very significant if Lord Scttaker were t be afreemason as they absolutely have to obey and protect every other Freemason who needs the hlep of a brother.
Why was Rosa Monckton so protected by Lord Baker and yet Burrell so attacked and why oh why does a supposed unbiased Coroner give out HEALTH WARNINGS only to Paul Burrell when there were obvious liars and those avoiding telling the turth on the JUST AN ACCIDENT side too.
Rosa Monckton's hearsay evidence was proposterous and indamissible due to her very close MI6 links and she certianly did not get dragged down by the Coroner, did she?
Rosa Monckton's hearsay evidence was OUTRAGEOUS and disgraceful
Can you magine if any other woman had come forward and said Diana was not pregnant as she had her period before my eyes and that was accepted as evidence by Both LORD Stevens and LORD Butler?
What if both Lord Stevens AND Lord Butler and Lord Condon and LORD Fellowes are all Freemasons proteting and upholding each other along with the heads of the Police force?
I believe the nation has a right to know these things which could lead to dangerous abuse of power and position, especailly in a case such as the case of diana;s tmely and highly suspicious death and all the lies that have been told.
• Posted by: Penny • Report Comment
CORRECTION - SHOULD READ NOT SLOW ON THIS FORUM
02.04.08, 8:37pm
i'm sure you realised that.
• Posted by: CRESSY • Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...