|
Columnists
![]() ![]()
|
KATE MOSS TURNS HEADS IN MALIBUFriday April 4,2008 HARD as it is to believe, Kate Moss managed to turn more heads than normal when she took to the streets of Malibu in hot pants with daughter Lila Grace this week.
Californian observers couldn’t help noticing that the 34-year-old supermodel, who is behind her own successful fashion range at Topshop – today voted best high street chain for the second year running in a magazine poll – didn’t appear to be sporting a bra.
|
|
||||||||||||

















HARD AS IT IS TO BELIEVE, YES, THAT'S RIGHT, MALIBU HAS NO STREETS
07.04.08, 4:51am
Just for the record ...
The city of Malibu is a 21-mile[5] (33.5 km) strip of Pacific coastline; a beachfront community famous for its warm, sandy beaches, and for being the home of countless movie stars and others associated with the Southern California entertainment industries. Most Malibu residents live within a few hundred yards of Pacific Coast Highway (State Route 1), which traverses the city, with some residents living up to a mile away from the beach up narrow canyons.
I know this area well and have driven Pacific Coast Highway and enjoyed the beaches on many a weekend.
Get that Daily Express? Malibu is a 21-mile strip. It's made up of beachfront, edge of the sea, expensive homes of the wealthy, which are usually so secure they are practically fortresses. And considering that traffic is fast, real fast, on Pacific Coast Highway, with no sidewalks!! I find it hard to believe that Kate Moss would have a yen to hobble along it and braless. She'd probably rather be seen dead doing anything so foolhardy, much more so than being spotted without a bra - and she'd end up dead if she tried it.
Please! Where do you folks dig up this stuff?
Posted by: Rothaymere Report Comment
HARD AS IT IS TO BELIEVE DE, MALIBU HAS NO STREETS.
07.04.08, 4:44am
With regards to this article...
Posted by: Rothaymere Report Comment
WHAT IS THAT?
04.04.08, 3:39pm
Ok I know this article is about Kate Moss turning heads, why not I'm in my 60's and an attractive "bra less" woman will still turn my head.
But what prompted me to reply here was, well what the hell was this from heelgrabba:--
"SUPRYZ! WAT SUPRYZ
04.04.08, 2:11pm
if KATE turnd mor hedz than expectud, then
thatz alot of heds, id say abowt a 300,000.
n thatz a conservitiv estimut."
Is that a foreign language? or is the sender still in primary school? I can't believe anyone could spell that badly without being totally illiterate so it must be intentional. I ask why? what purpose does it serve?It's not as though it's a form of shorthand.
Morons abound can be the only answer.
Posted by: Wrinkles1 Report Comment
SUPRYZ! WAT SUPRYZ
04.04.08, 2:11pm
if KATE turnd mor hedz than expectud, then
thatz alot of heds, id say abowt a 300,000.
n thatz a conservitiv estimut.
Posted by: Heelgraba00 Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...