Daily Express - Breaking news, sport and showbiz from the World's Greatest Newspaper
Newspaper Cover Page
Our Paper

Front and Back Pages, E-Edition and Back Issues...

Weather
 4°C
London
Friday 5th December 2008 Make us your HOME PAGE  What is RSS?

UK NEWS

BANKS IN CURRENT ACCOUNTS RIP-OFF

Story Image


PRICE RISES: Is it the end of free banking?

Friday May 9,2008

By Louise Barnett Consumer Editor

BANKS were criticised last night for ramping up fees on current accounts as fears grow that the days of free banking are numbered.

Lloyds TSB, NatWest and Royal Bank of Scotland are this month pushing up charges on a range of paid-for accounts by as much as 20 per cent.


An estimated seven million customers have already been targeted in the rip-off. And there are fears that charges will eventually be imposed on standard current accounts, marking an end to the tradition of free banking.


Kevin Mountford, head of savings at moneysupermarket.com, said: “There is a genuine fear that we will see the end of free banking in the UK. Instead we will see pricing structures similar to those in other developed countries – fees aligned to transactions.”

SEARCH UK NEWS for:


The changes are being introduced ahead of the outcome of a court case over fees charged by banks for unauthorised overdrafts.


Banks currently make up to £3.5billion a year from these charges, with fees as high as £35 for a single bounced cheque.


But they could lose some or all of that income and be hit with a £10billion bill for refunds if the courts decide those charges must be scrapped or capped.


Cristina Rebollo, of the price comparison website uSwitch.com, warned: “The UK is one of the only places in the world that doesn’t charge for current accounts.


“Customers have enjoyed free banking for 23 years but the current backlash against charges for items such as overdrafts and bounced cheques could serve as catalyst for the fast introduction of flat monthly fees on current accounts.”


Around 8.5million people in the UK pay for “packaged” accounts which come bundled with extras such as travel or phone insurance and breakdown cover. Fees range from £6 to £25 a month. But these paid-for accounts still make up a small proportion of the 120million current and savings accounts.


Moneyfacts.co.uk spokesman Andrew Hagger said banks would not start charging for current accounts until after the court case ends.


“I don’t really see anyone coming out with a fee-charging current account in the interim,” he said. “No doubt they will be thinking about it behind the scenes.”


Lloyds TSB has increased its monthly gold and platinum account fees by £2 each to £12 and £17 respectively from May 1. NatWest, which is part of the Royal Bank of Scotland group, will raise monthly charges from May 31 for its Advantage Blue and Gold accounts by 95p to £6.95 and £12.95.


The banks deny the increases are linked to the impending decision on overdraft fees, saying they reflect the increased services bundled with each deal. Lloyds TSB said it was the first increase in four years. But experts said banks were looking for alternative sources of income and warned there would be more increases in charges to come.


Doug Taylor, of consumer group Which?, urged customers to think twice before paying for a packaged account. “For most people they are not a particularly good deal.”


User Image

WHY ARE THE BIG FIVE UK BANKS ALLOWED TO RIP-OFF THE PUBLIC TO THE TUNE OF £30BILLION IN THE LAST YEAR?

09.05.08, 4:54pm

As far as I know banks do NOT have any money of their own.

They have buildings, with signs welded to the wall. They have computers and staff.

Enter the scenario Joe Public.

Banks rip-off everyone that is daft enough to walk through the door - account charges, overdraft fees, travel insurance, home insurance, pet insurance and they pay a mere pittance to depositors.

This is yet another of GREED. GREED and even more GREED.

Taking from the poor and giving the money to the already rich.

If I remember correctly, when the riots kicked-off in Toxteth, Liverpool some years ago, the first targets of the rioters were the banks.

Nothing changes.
#
And that fat slob of a Dictator Prudence U-Turn Brown could not care less about Joe Public.

• Posted by: ReubenMohawaliReport Comment

User Image

BANKS IN CURRENT ACCOUNTS RIP OFF !

09.05.08, 1:16pm

How much do banks charge for Gov: business ?
Pensions benefits of all sorts, direct debits, etc, etc. Did not the Post Office have this business at one time?
Has all of this been one big scam by Mamon, to gain a monopoly in the financial world ? Annihilate opposition / competition !
Give the banking system to the Post Office. !
How can world economy be based with these people, mortgages.... bit of a showmans high wire act, something less open to manipulation,
a little more substantial / professional, a little to:-Del boy for my liking !

• Posted by: juan01Report Comment

User Image

THE BASICS OF BANKING.

09.05.08, 12:14pm

Theory:Banks collect deposits from savers, and lend the proceeds to borrowers.
The bank pays a minimal interest rate on the deposits accrued (taxable at source) and then charges at least one hundred times the minimum rate of interest paid out to depositors to the unfortunate borrower, all with horrendous default charges should said borrower be so stupid as to miss a payment.
A kings ransom for being piggy in the middle, sat on yer arse doing sod all and without liability.

So why are these greedy trough masters being permitted to charge service fees on current accounts in credit?
This surely is tantamount to biting the hand that feeds you, or in the fullness of time, killing the goose that lays the golden egg in the normal world?

• Posted by: kojakReport Comment

User Image

FREE LUNCH?

09.05.08, 11:37am

What's all the fuss? If you ask someone other than a friend to look after 'something' for you; you will not be surprised if they charge you for doing so. If that person hires-out that 'something' on your behalf, you expect to be given the hire fee less a fee for administration.
If the same person is forced to provide a service or incur a cost because of something you have done, you will also not be surprised if you're charged for that. I started by using the term 'other than a friend'. It's many years since Banks were anyone's 'friend'. Indeed, they never were such. However, in the past, their marketing strategy was to suggest they were some sort of benevolent society; ready to help you out when you were in need and to turn a blind eye to your financial indiscretions such as spending too much or 'forgetting to make a payment on time or sign a check when you knew you had no funds to cover it. You were naive and they were ineffecient. In the last 20 years they have slowly discovered they are a business - not an institution as they loved to call themselves. Since it's people's money that started Banks and continues to support them then it is in the interest of people to ensure that Banks are run efficiently as profitable enterprises. Forget the cozy, head -in the-sand past. As the song says 'those days have gone now- and in the past they must remain'.
You are in this mess because of your greed which Banks and others are feeding on. But too much greed, like food, can cause an upset which, if untreated, becomes chronic. The prognosis is not good. The cure is usually drastic. In the case of subprimemortgaitis- it has been a clear example of 'phisycian heal thyself'.

• Posted by: meagainReport Comment

User Image

"A ROUGH GUIDE TO IRRITATING BRITAIN"

09.05.08, 9:50am

"There's always enough for the needy but never enough for the greedy"

I use on line banking with a well known, Mutual building society..I keep tidy books....as a result they pay me for being with them....

• Posted by: TicTocReport Comment

User Image

IT HAD TO HAPPEN...

09.05.08, 9:43am

If you have an income source that is taken away you still need to find the income to provide the service.

I think the banks were underhand with the fees they charged for overdrafts, returned cheques etc... greedy is another word and now they are getting their comeuppance. But they will make the money somehow.

If/when the charges do come into effect people will have to learn to manage their accounts so reducing the impact of the charges.

The banks should also remove the free transaction ATMs in 'poorer' areas (for none same bank customers). That will also make people manage their accounts better and plan ahead. Then others who do manage their accounts won't be subsidizing the free loaders.

Sometimes, there is too much given away on a plate so people expect more. When in fact they should be getting the same but managing it better.


• Posted by: easymoniesReport Comment

View All Comments

To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...

Share...

Got A Story? Get in touch online
Email the news desk directly here!


Straw to face prison officers

Justice Secretary Jack Straw is expected to receive a hostile reception when he ...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(1)

Civilians die in Iraq base attack

Two civilians have been killed and a British serviceman injured in a rocket atta...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(0)

Labour threat to ban alcohol on all trains

LABOUR could ban alcohol on all trains and buses in a move that critics have sla...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(0)

Todays best TV right here for you at the Express. • See Guide

The Political Cartoonist of the Year