Daily Express - Breaking news, sport and showbiz from the World's Greatest Newspaper
Newspaper Cover Page
Our Paper

Front and Back Pages, E-Edition and Back Issues...

Weather
 5°C
London
Monday 1st December 2008 Make us your HOME PAGE  What is RSS?

UK NEWS

NEW BENEFITS SCANDAL EXPOSED

Story Image


Scroungers refuse to work due to 'stress'

Monday June 9,2008

By Macer Hall Political Editor

THE number of jobless claiming handouts for being “too stressed” to work has soared by 800 per cent under Labour.

A record 51,790 claimants pick up stress-related incapacity benefit and cost hard-hit taxpayers £122million every year in Britain’s sicknote culture.


The payments – which have soared from just 5,700 before Labour came to power in 1997 – reflect a growing awareness of illnesses linked to stress at work, insist officials. But critics suspect many claimants are workshy scroungers malingering at the taxpayer’s expense.


The figures – revealed only after a Freedom of Information request – will fuel growing concern over the £12billion annual cost of sickness benefits handed out to around 2.7million people.


SEARCH UK NEWS for:

Tory Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Chris Grayling said: “It’s no good the Government leaving these people to remain on benefits for the rest of their lives. We need a firm but fair approach that gets them back into work.”


Claimants can qualify for incapacity benefit if they are diagnosed with the medical condition “reaction to severe stress”. They must also face a medical test of incapacity for work, which is known as the Personal Capability Assessment.


But that has not deterred the growing number of claims for handouts. The UK has one of Europe’s highest proportions of people on incapacity benefit.


It is also feared the benefits system is open to abuse. Earlier this year a welfare adviser revealed how fewer than a third of claims are legitimate.


Investment banker David Freud, who produced a Government report welfare policy, warned that up to 185,000 claimants work illegally while on the benefit.


But the Department for Work and Pensions insisted that the number of people claiming incapacity benefit was at its lowest level since 2000.


“People don’t automatically get incapacity benefits because they suffer from severe stress,” said a spokesman. “We look at the impact a condition has on a person’s ability to work and there are strict checks in place.


“We’re overhauling the whole system of incapacity benefits to place the emphasis on what work people can do, not what they can’t.” He said Work and Pensions staff were adopting a new policy aimed at helping people with mental health problems – such as severe stress – to get back into work.


“Mental health conditions have, by and large, replaced bad backs and similar conditions as the main reason why people claim incapacity benefits,” he said.


“This is because of better recognition of these health problems and a reduction in people who do heavy manual work.”


But Matthew Elliott, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance campaign,  hit out at the rocketing levels of state payments.


“Too many people who are able to work are either wrongly signed off or are being allowed to malinger at the taxpayer’s expense,” he said.


“It's no good for taxpayers, the wider economy or these individuals for tens of thousands of people to be put on the scrapheap when they could be helped back to work.”


He added: “What you have to ask is, why have the numbers of people with stress gone up? Are people’s lives now more stressful? It is difficult to see why they should be.” Mr Elliott also attacked the current assessment system and called for changes which would relieve the pressure placed on medical professionals, who must make crucial judgments on claimants’ conditions.


“The problem we have at the moment is that people are being signed off by doctors far too easily,” he said.


“If you go to a doctor, saying you are stressed and unable to work, and the doctor does not accept your diagnosis, they are  effectively calling you a liar. That puts doctors in an impossible position.”


He added: “Surely a better system would be to have Government-approved doctors to assess the worth of people's claims.


“It would not be just for stress but all the other medical reasons which people give for making them unable to work.”


User Image

NEW BENEFITS SCANDAL EXPOSED

10.06.08, 8:22am

Is there any real difference between the so called fraudulent activities of these Dole Scroungers and the Snouts in the trough activities of ALL THOSE IN WESTMINSTER ?

Other than the fact that MP's scandalously vote to legitimise theirs - Joe Public does not have that option.

• Posted by: EmperorMingReport Comment

User Image

ALBERTTHEDOG

10.06.08, 7:44am

Congratulations for taking your health in your own hands and getting rid of the belly.
You are right many back problems are caused by being overweight and particularly around the belly area that causes strain on the spine.
But stress is a bit different.
We all know there are people out there that will overplay the symptons of stress to have time off work or claim benefits but for the ones for whom stress/ depression is a reality it is an extremely lonely and desolate place to be.
Maybe the human body is really not designed for the 10 hour intensive thinking/ working day.
Stuck in traffic for an hour either side of the working day adds to the problem.
We must learn the difference between benefit scroungers and the genuine case.
We must learn the difference between the genuine hard working employer and the one who makes his/her profits from over exploiting the talents and dedication of his/her employees.

• Posted by: marigoldReport Comment

User Image

STRESSED ? LET LABOUR TAKE THE STRAIN

10.06.08, 6:05am

It has long been Labours policy on benefits to see that no union member has any problem claiming, they think that any benefit that can lead to a better life for their members is justified and valid. Stuff the rest of the people is the selfish motto of the unions, there is a hard core of left wing voters that is keeping them in power, they use intimidation as a matter of routine, one such ploy is to run a round meetings calling people scabs and telling of the miners strike antics of some hardliners. The other method of keeping voters is BRIBARY hence the increase in stress related give away benefits.

Stress is hard to disprove as has already been said about this being the alternative to the bad back syndrome. I suffered with my back when I had a fat belly, what happens if you are fat (I love that word because I am no longer fat, I dieted) the strain on your spine increases with your waistline. Diet and exercise cure it. There is even a standard method of claiming where you are told to say what your Union Rep or Labour councillor tells you to, the rest is rigged on your behalf. So join a union and rip the rest of us off like Labour always have and still do.

• Posted by: albertthedogReport Comment

User Image

STRESS IN THE WORK PLACE IS A GROWING PROBLEM

09.06.08, 11:50pm

Companies often run on minimum staff requirements and yet expect more input/ hours etc from employees.
Competition to succeed in the workplace is high and employees often feel they have to put in more hours or more effort just to achieve a bit more money in the paypacket or a bit of status in the company.
The fact that the whole thing is a slave labour con to keep the rich in luxurious surroundings does not deter the workers.
Stress may be the consequence if the results do not come up to scratch !

• Posted by: marigoldReport Comment

User Image

MANY PHYSICAL AND MENTAL CONDITIONS AFFECTED BY STRESS

09.06.08, 11:31pm

Contrary to the opinion expressed by the front page today, it is not easy to be diagnosed with a condition which makes one entitled to incapacity benefit.

There are many people who are seriously disabled who may well be able to do unpressured tasks in a suitable work situation, but very few would be able to compete for rewarding work.

The danger is that making people liable to work will only increase the jobless total and make it difficult/impossible for such people to cope. Any work they will get will be unskilled and possiby in an environment which could contribute to further breakdowns, particularly for those who have severe and enduring mental illness.

Do these people not merit some quality of life. They did not usually cause their own misfortune.

If people are lucky in life they may not necessarily work or act any more responsibly than the incapacitated. They are not necessarily more deserving than the unfortunates they are just lucky.

• Posted by: Hosea1Report Comment

User Image

** COMMENT REMOVED **

09.06.08, 9:36pm

** comment removed **

• Posted by: FuhrerReport Comment

View All Comments

To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...

Share...

Got A Story? Get in touch online
Email the news desk directly here!


Tributes to avalanche death couple

A pair of British musicians who died in an avalanche were described as a most &q...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(0)

Mayor's London audit uncovers shock

The head of an audit panel investigating financial management at the London Deve...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(0)

ID cards 'may be used to spy on us'

The compulsory identity card could be used to carry out surveillance on people, ...

Read More Comment Speech Bubble Have Your Say(0)

Todays best TV right here for you at the Express. • See Guide

The Political Cartoonist of the Year