UK NEWS
TAXPAYERS ARE FORKING OUT FOR MPS' FOOD
ALCOHOL TAX RISE: Alistair Darling
By Macer Hall and Gabriel Milland
GREEDY MPs have secretly slapped a five per cent limit on price rises in the taxpayer-subsidised bars, restaurants and cafeterias of Westminster, it emerged last night.
As a result, they will escape the crippling price hikes of up to 18 per cent faced by the public in supermarkets and other stores across the country.
Taxpayers will be forced to pay an extra £5million a year to bankroll the exclusive food and drink.
It means hundreds of peers and MPs can carry on guzzling lavish food and alcohol at a fraction of the cost outside Westminster.
Last night, the latest grasping move by the political elite ignited more fury about the excesses of the Westminster gravy train.
MORE TOP STORIES ON EXPRESS.CO.UK
HAVE YOUR SAY: SHOULD WE HAVE TO FORK OUT FOR MPs FOOD?
|
Our customers will be paying more in tax on their own drink to subsidise MPs paying less for their drink in Westminster
|
Mark Hastings, spokesman for the British Beer and Pub Association
|
BLOG: GET US OUT OF THIS MESS GORD...AND THEN QUIT
NEWS: JACQUI SMITH REFUSES TO RESIGN OVER EXPENSES ROW
MPs already enjoy heavily subsidised food and drink prices – a cup of tea costs 30p, a breakfast about £2.10 and a pint of lager is about £1 cheaper than in nearby pubs.
They are also able to claim up to £400 a month for groceries.
Recession-hit families struggling with rampant food price inflation are bound to be appalled at having to subsidise the dining and drinking of MPs.
Critics seized on the move – by a Commons committee of MPs – as latest evidence of a shameless
“snouts in the trough” culture throughout the political establishment.
It follows anger at shocking revelations about expenses abuses and other sleaze at the House of Commons.
Susie Squire, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance campaign group, said: “It’s unbelievable that after the handsome salary and perks MPs receive that they are trying to squeeze even more money out of taxpayers.
“The rest of the country is having to pay more to put their own food on the table. Yet again, this shows that too many MPs are unconcerned as to the realities facing their constituents.”
The decision also outraged campaigners against swingeing tax rises on alcohol imposed by Chancellor Alistair Darling.
Mark Hastings, spokesman for the British Beer and Pub Association, said: “Our customers will be paying more in tax on their own drink to subsidise MPs paying less for their drink in Westminster.”
A spokesman for the Drinkers Alliance said: “The hypocrisy of our politicians is breathtaking. It’s not surprising outrage about their behaviour grows daily.
“At the very least they should abandon plans to raise taxes on drinks in this month’s Budget.”
The astonishing decision was taken by the Commons Finance and Service Committee on March 19.
MPs have access to nearly a dozen bars, cafeterias and restaurants within the Palace of Westminster.
The subsidy keeps down the cost of gourmet dishes including Scottish fillet steak, loin of venison, Devon crab and bottles of champagne.
MPs, who earn £64,766 after getting a 2.33 per cent pay hike this month and claim on average £144,000 expenses each year, can enjoy three-course meals plus coffee for as little as £12 in their exclusive dining rooms.
£20,000 SALARY DOES NOT NEED SUBSIDISING
08.04.09, 2:27pm
Many of the taxpayers in this countryhave not yet reached the dizzy hights of a £20,000 salary, any person on such a salary does not need a subsidised canteen, the government has already decided that it's possible to eat AND live adequately on £3,000 per annum (jobseekers allowance) so MillyB your salary is more than enough !
Posted by: moonlighter Report Comment
THIS COUNTRY IS A LIVING HELL....
08.04.09, 12:47am
Its citizens are now being harmed at all levels of this tyranical imposter government and yes they are all Scottish.....ha ha ha
Posted by: RealIstic08 Report Comment
FOR CHRIST'S SAKE JUST SACK ME, SAYS DARLING
07.04.09, 9:41pm
ALISTAIR Darling last night pleaded for his immediate dismissal, stressing he was the worst chancellor in more than 60 years.
George Ward Hunt could only count to three Mr Darling told the Guardian that not since Hugh Dalton in 1947 had the Treasury been in the hands of someone so comprehensively incapable.
He added: "Things are bad. And understandably a lot of people would like to cut my nuts off with a broken bottle.
"But we must remember that Britain is being affected by a series of global economic challenges that I'm making much, much worse.
"I would also stress that chancellors are likely to get worse before they get better, especially if he gives the job to Ed Balls or his ghastly wife."
But economists disputed the chancellor's assessment. Tom Logan, of Reading University, said: "We're actually experiencing a far worse chancellor than 1947.
"You really have to go back to George Ward Hunt in 1868, who accidentally flushed his Budget down the bog and was eventually replaced by a cat."
In a wide ranging interview Mr Darling also said the Labour Party was 'a lot of f****** rubbish' and called for former Scottish leader Wendy Alexander to pushed under a herd of stampeding bulls.
Posted by: LordHarri Report Comment
TAXPAYERS ARE FORKING OUT FOR MPS' FOOD
07.04.09, 9:28pm
Does anyone remember the old saying "Nero fiddles while Rome is burning "now think of this situation who is fiddling while the people are burning ,starving and destitute ,the time is ripe for a party of the people for the people (hmmm i heard that somewhere before too) to take away this excuse for a goverment ,we are in need of a prime minister who can act for us and listen to us and mp,s who can be our voice in the house of commons ,what do we get liars and thieves who are only after one thing taxpayers money .
Posted by: paul1263 Report Comment
'QUANTITATIVE EASING' !
07.04.09, 7:47pm
Darlings 'mug shot ' at the top of the piece looks more like a man in need of a good enema than more food.
Posted by: wiggins Report Comment
JUST THE SURFACE
07.04.09, 7:40pm
this is just surface chicken feed,WHY ELSE DOES ONE THINK MPs needed time to provide falsified receits before publication of information or why they tried to block publication altogether?
They hide behind "WITHIN THE RULES" but they know they are wrong, amasses me how they sleep at night.
Posted by: RobertG Report Comment
To view all 'Have Your Say' comments, click this button...